Slave Master Slave •Open-source NewSQL database •High availability •Strong consistency •Horizontal scalability •Support the MySQL wire protocol https://github.com/pingcap/tidb
 TiDB Overview MySQL

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in grouping is a poor choice because the fundamental ideas of grouped (i.e. ordered) messages and horizontal scaling through clustering are essentially at odds with each other. Message grouping enforces

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in odds with each other. Clustering was designed as a way to increase message throughput through horizontal scaling. The messages in a clustered queue can be spread across all nodes in the cluster. This

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in odds with each other. Clustering was designed as a way to increase message throughput through horizontal scaling. The messages in a clustered queue can be spread across all nodes in the cluster. This

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in odds with each other. Clustering was designed as a way to increase message throughput through horizontal scaling. The messages in a clustered queue can be spread across all nodes in the cluster. This

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in grouping is a poor choice because the fundamental ideas of grouped (i.e. ordered) messages and horizontal scaling through clustering are essentially at odds with each other. Message grouping enforces

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in odds with each other. Clustering was designed as a way to increase message throughput through horizontal scaling. The messages in a clustered queue can be spread across all nodes in the cluster. This

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in odds with each other. Clustering was designed as a way to increase message throughput through horizontal scaling. The messages in a clustered queue can be spread across all nodes in the cluster. This

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in grouping is a poor choice because the fundamental ideas of grouped (i.e. ordered) messages and horizontal scaling through clustering are essentially at odds with each other. Message grouping enforces

consumers to share a subscription on a topic. In JMS 1.1 this was not allowed and so caused a scalability issue. In JMS 2 this restriction has been lifted so you can share the load across different threads relatively small messages and a small number of consumers, but at the cost of overall throughput and scalability - especially on multi-core machines. If you want the lowest latency and a possible reduction in grouping is a poor choice because the fundamental ideas of grouped (i.e. ordered) messages and horizontal scaling through clustering are essentially at odds with each other. Message grouping enforces