Tornado 6.4 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI-only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 268 页 | 1.09 MB | 1 年前3Tornado 6.4 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI-only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 268 页 | 1.09 MB | 1 年前3Tornado 6.4 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI-only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 268 页 | 1.09 MB | 1 年前3Tornado 6.3 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI-only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 264 页 | 1.06 MB | 1 年前3Tornado 6.5 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI-only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 272 页 | 1.12 MB | 2 月前3Tornado 6.4 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI- only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 432 页 | 402.58 KB | 1 年前3Tornado 6.4 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI- only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 432 页 | 402.58 KB | 1 年前3Tornado 6.4 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI- only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 432 页 | 402.58 KB | 1 年前3Tornado 6.3 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI- only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 423 页 | 398.18 KB | 1 年前3Tornado 6.5 Documentation
in development and light-duty file serving; for heavy traffic it will be more efficient to use a dedicated static file server (such as nginx or Apache). We support the HTTP Accept-Ranges mechanism to return RequestHandlers in a single process. WSGI- only applications are likely to be better off with a dedicated WSGI server such as gunicorn or uwsgi. Wrap a WSGI application in a WSGIContainer to make it implement0 码力 | 437 页 | 405.14 KB | 2 月前3
共 20 条
- 1
- 2