Krita’s HDR. When exporting this image with HLG, it’s recommended to reuse the same values for the reverse OOTF there. Apply Hybrid Log Gamma OOTF Whether to apply the extra conversion step. This will convert to Rec 2020 linear. Then encoded with the Hybrid Log Gamma function, and finally, if chosen, the reverse Hybrid Log Gamma OOTF is applied. This is useful for images where the final display may not understand The image will be linearized first, and then encoded with a Hybrid Log Gamma curve. Finally, the reverse HLG OOTF may be applied. Keep Colorants, encode SMPTE ST 428 Shows only for images with an ITU

Krita’s HDR. When exporting this image with HLG, it’s recommended to reuse the same values for the reverse OOTF there. Apply Hybrid Log Gamma OOTF Whether to apply the extra conversion step. This will convert to Rec 2020 linear. Then encoded with the Hybrid Log Gamma function, and finally, if chosen, the reverse Hybrid Log Gamma OOTF is applied. This is useful for images where the final display may not understand The image will be linearized first, and then encoded with a Hybrid Log Gamma curve. Finally, the reverse HLG OOTF may be applied. Keep Colorants, encode SMPTE ST 428 Shows only for images with an ITU

Krita's HDR. When exporting this image with HLG, it's recommended to reuse the same values for the reverse OOTF there. Apply Hybrid Log Gamma OOTF Whether to apply the extra conversion step. This will convert to Rec 2020 linear. Then encoded with the Hybrid Log Gamma function, and finally, if chosen, the reverse Hybrid Log Gamma OOTF is applied. This is useful for images where the final display may not understand The image will be linearized first, and then encoded with a Hybrid Log Gamma curve. Finally, the reverse HLG OOTF may be applied. Keep Colorants, encode SMPTE ST 428 Shows only for images with an ITU

and it is always possible to write it in a way that replicates the foreach() behavior, though the reverse is not true. On the other hand, there is a bad, dangerous worst case performance hit when a detach/copy because they should always be executed in the end of the action (in qt commands are executed in reverse order during undo operations, that is not what we want). And, btw, it would be really good idea is very easy to report progress using progress bars in the layer box. We just need to use progress proxy of the node we process (KisNodeProgressProxy). Our processings framework provides an even easier way

and it is always possible to write it in a way that replicates the foreach() behavior, though the reverse is not true. On the other hand, there is a bad, dangerous worst case performance hit when a detach/copy because they should always be executed in the end of the action (in qt commands are executed in reverse order during undo operations, that is not what we want). And, btw, it would be really good idea is very easy to report progress using progress bars in the layer box. We just need to use progress proxy of the node we process (KisNodeProgressProxy). Our processings framework provides an even easier way

and it is always possible to write it in a way that replicates the foreach() behavior, though the reverse is not true. On the other hand, there is a bad, dangerous worst case performance hit when a detach/copy because they should always be executed in the end of the action (in qt commands are executed in reverse order during undo operations, that is not what we want). And, btw, it would be really good idea is very easy to report progress using progress bars in the layer box. We just need to use progress proxy of the node we process (KisNodeProgressProxy). Our processings framework provides an even easier way

and it is always possible to write it in a way that replicates the foreach() behavior, though the reverse is not true. On the other hand, there is a bad, dangerous worst case performance hit when a detach/copy because they should always be executed in the end of the action (in qt commands are executed in reverse order during undo operations, that is not what we want). And, btw, it would be really good idea is very easy to report progress using progress bars in the layer box. We just need to use progress proxy of the node we process (KisNodeProgressProxy). Our processings framework provides an even easier way

and it is always possible to write it in a way that replicates the foreach() behavior, though the reverse is not true. On the other hand, there is a bad, dangerous worst case performance hit when a detach/copy because they should always be executed in the end of the action (in qt commands are executed in reverse order during undo operations, that is not what we want). And, btw, it would be really good idea is very easy to report progress using progress bars in the layer box. We just need to use progress proxy of the node we process (KisNodeProgressProxy). Our processings framework provides an even easier way

and it is always possible to write it in a way that replicates the foreach() behavior, though the reverse is not true. On the other hand, there is a bad, dangerous worst case performance hit when a detach/copy because they should always be executed in the end of the action (in qt commands are executed in reverse order during undo operations, that is not what we want). And, btw, it would be really good idea is very easy to report progress using progress bars in the layer box. We just need to use progress proxy of the node we process (KisNodeProgressProxy). Our processings framework provides an even easier way