and guidance • WG23 Vulnerabilities ISO for C, C++, Ada, Fortran, … • Guidelines for teamleads • Reviewed with each ISO C, C++, Ada, Fortran help Which one to choose and what is the difference? Comparing MISRA meeting • Why are there no rules for parallelism in MISRA? • 2019-2021: Phase 1 complete • Reviewed 81 rules pulled from • C++CG • HIC++ • REphrase H2020 project • CERT C++ • JSF++ (no parallel rules) choice Safety implies careful analysis of assumption introduced by dependencies, this one should be reviewed with especial care Is it easy to detect via review? • It is not visible in code and should be applied

improve the fuzz test suite of Istio. During the initial assessment, the Ada Logics auditing team reviewed the existing fuzzing set up. At the start of the audit, we made the following observations: ● Istio which can be found here: https://istio.io/latest/blog/2021/ncc-security-assessment/ Ada Logics reviewed how these fixes had been approached by the Istio community a�er they had been reported by the previous controlled ✓ ✓ ✓ Source - Verified history ✓ ✓ Source - Retained indefinitely Source - Two-person reviewed Build - Scripted build ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Build - Build service ✓ ✓ ✓ Build - Build as code ✓ ✓ Build -

Push the code to a Git repository. 2. Create a pull request. 3. After that, this code can be reviewed and scrutinized by another team member and finally get approved—which triggers the CI/CD pipeline resource increments and push the changes to the Git repository. Then these changes can be quickly reviewed and verified by other team members and approved for production deployment. This triggers the GitOps

their work reviewed and merged by another member of the team. Similarly, substantial patches with significant implications for the codebase from other members of the community should be reviewed and discussed django-cms-developers mailing list so as not to do any work that will not get merged in anyway. • Code will be reviewed and tested by at least one core developer, preferably by several. Other community members are welcome Documentation, Release 3.0.19.dev1 ready for review (pull requests only) The pull request needs to be reviewed. (Anyone can review and make comments recommending that it be merged (or indeed, any further action)

to render the content unescaped, no further action is required. Once all template tags have been reviewed and adjusted where necessary, the administrator should set CMS_UNESCAPED_RENDER_MODEL_TAGS = False [https://github.com/divio/django-cms] - they should arrive in the form of pull requests so that they can be reviewed publicly. Nothing may enter the code-base, including the documentation, without proper review and developers] mailing list so as not to do any work that will not get merged in anyway. Code will be reviewed and tested by at least one core developer, preferably by several. Other community members are welcome

Exception • Implemented ~50 C++20 features • Majority from our amazing contributors • Extensively reviewed and tested • Released VS 2019 16.5, 16.6, 16.7, 16.8 Preview 3 • GitHub migration ongoing • Build ostr << flt precision • Fixed long-standing bugs while preserving ABI • Every PR is extensively reviewed by 2 maintainers • Keeps code at production quality: always ready to ship • Helps the team understand

Exception • Implemented ~50 C++20 features • Majority from our amazing contributors • Extensively reviewed and tested • Released VS 2019 16.5, 16.6, 16.7, 16.8 Preview 3 • GitHub migration ongoing • Build ostr << flt precision • Fixed long-standing bugs while preserving ABI • Every PR is extensively reviewed by 2 maintainers • Keeps code at production quality: always ready to ship • Helps the team understand

approval, and release build. The “definition of done” does not change during a sprint, but should be reviewed periodically and updated as processes improve. “To become Agile, it is not sufficient to just  How frequently is code integrated and tested in the developer’s environment?  Is all code reviewed by at least one other team member prior to system testing?  How frequently are scope changes reviews and more on in-progress reviews of an empowered team. The small, frequent releases should be reviewed and approved at the lowest possible level, likely a Program Executive Officer or related official

Conclusions 15 Chapter 11. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the various people that have reviewed and commented on this article. I would also like to thank the many people that contribute to the 2005 G W First edition. N/ A 11 Apr 2005 G W The section on “Acceptable low security” was reviewed to try and highlight simple XOR algorithms as weak to ensure that readers investigate further if